Everyday consumer products, ranging from cosmetics to personal care items, frequently contain chemicals that present potential health hazards, including carcinogenic properties. Ingredients such as phthalates, parabens, formaldehyde, synthetic fragrances, colors, and PEGs are commonly found in these products and have been associated with adverse health effects. For instance, formaldehyde, often used as a preservative, is classified as a human carcinogen, with its releasers present in products like eyelash glue and hair gel. Compounds like coal tar, benzene, mineral oils, and chromium also raise concerns, with some studies indicating possible links to conditions such as breast cancer, particularly in relation to permanent hair dye use.
The regulation of cosmetics and personal care products by the FDA is relatively lax compared to other regions. While bodies such as the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and the US National Toxicology Program (NTP) classify substances as known, probable, or possible carcinogens, regulatory standards vary across different jurisdictions. Taking a proactive approach involves scrutinizing product labels, identifying harmful ingredients, and opting for reputable brands. The European Union has stricter regulations compared to the United States, where restrictions often lag behind emerging research findings.
Recent studies have shed light on the landscape of personal care products used by communities, highlighting disparities in exposure and regulation. A study conducted last year focused on women of color in California, revealing gaps in understanding the prevalence of carcinogens, reproductive toxicants, and endocrine disruptors in their personal care products. Utilizing targeted analysis and suspect screening, the research provided a comprehensive evaluation of potentially hazardous chemicals across six product categories. Hair products, in particular, were found to contain a significant number of Chemicals of Concern (CoCs), with parabens being a predominant group detected in multiple products.
The study underscored concerns regarding undisclosed fragrance ingredients, which were found in a substantial percentage of products, including those used by Black women. The presence of Prop 65-listed carcinogens and reproductive toxicants on product labels further underscored potential health risks associated with routine use. Moreover, linguistic barriers were noted, with some products bearing labels in languages other than English, in violation of U.S. federal law.
Laboratory testing revealed a spectrum of CoCs, encompassing endocrine disruptors, carcinogens, and reproductive toxicants. Examples included benzyl chloride, unintentional additives like 1,4-dioxane, and significant levels of diethyl phthalate, a suspected endocrine disruptor commonly found in leave-on skin moisturizers. Fragrance-related issues persisted, with undisclosed ingredients detected in nail products and other categories, posing additional challenges to consumer safety and informed decision-making.
Despite limitations in sample size and product representation, the study called for expanded research efforts and automated screening tools to better monitor and disclose potentially harmful ingredients. It advocated for enhanced regulatory transparency and consumer education to promote safer cosmetic practices. Highlighting recent legislative initiatives in California, the study emphasized the importance of ingredient transparency and urged comprehensive reforms to ensure the safety of personal care products.
In summary, the study underscored the need for continued investigation into the health risks posed by CoCs in personal care items. It urged policymakers to reevaluate current regulatory frameworks, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive ingredient disclosure and informed consumer choices. By raising awareness and advocating for safer practices, the study aimed to mitigate potential health hazards associated with everyday cosmetic and personal care product use.
Everyday consumer products, ranging from cosmetics to personal care items, frequently contain chemicals that present potential health hazards, including carcinogenic properties. Ingredients such as phthalates, parabens, formaldehyde, synthetic fragrances, colors, and PEGs are commonly found in these products and have been associated with adverse health effects. For instance, formaldehyde, often used as a preservative, is classified as a human carcinogen, with its releasers present in products like eyelash glue and hair gel. Compounds like coal tar, benzene, mineral oils, and chromium also raise concerns, with some studies indicating possible links to conditions such as breast cancer, particularly in relation to permanent hair dye use.
The regulation of cosmetics and personal care products by the FDA is relatively lax compared to other regions. While bodies such as the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and the US National Toxicology Program (NTP) classify substances as known, probable, or possible carcinogens, regulatory standards vary across different jurisdictions. Taking a proactive approach involves scrutinizing product labels, identifying harmful ingredients, and opting for reputable brands. The European Union has stricter regulations compared to the United States, where restrictions often lag behind emerging research findings.
Recent studies have shed light on the landscape of personal care products used by communities, highlighting disparities in exposure and regulation. A study conducted last year focused on women of color in California, revealing gaps in understanding the prevalence of carcinogens, reproductive toxicants, and endocrine disruptors in their personal care products. Utilizing targeted analysis and suspect screening, the research provided a comprehensive evaluation of potentially hazardous chemicals across six product categories. Hair products, in particular, were found to contain a significant number of Chemicals of Concern (CoCs), with parabens being a predominant group detected in multiple products.
The study underscored concerns regarding undisclosed fragrance ingredients, which were found in a substantial percentage of products, including those used by Black women. The presence of Prop 65-listed carcinogens and reproductive toxicants on product labels further underscored potential health risks associated with routine use. Moreover, linguistic barriers were noted, with some products bearing labels in languages other than English, in violation of U.S. federal law.
Laboratory testing revealed a spectrum of CoCs, encompassing endocrine disruptors, carcinogens, and reproductive toxicants. Examples included benzyl chloride, unintentional additives like 1,4-dioxane, and significant levels of diethyl phthalate, a suspected endocrine disruptor commonly found in leave-on skin moisturizers. Fragrance-related issues persisted, with undisclosed ingredients detected in nail products and other categories, posing additional challenges to consumer safety and informed decision-making.
Despite limitations in sample size and product representation, the study called for expanded research efforts and automated screening tools to better monitor and disclose potentially harmful ingredients. It advocated for enhanced regulatory transparency and consumer education to promote safer cosmetic practices. Highlighting recent legislative initiatives in California, the study emphasized the importance of ingredient transparency and urged comprehensive reforms to ensure the safety of personal care products.
In summary, the study underscored the need for continued investigation into the health risks posed by CoCs in personal care items. It urged policymakers to reevaluate current regulatory frameworks, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive ingredient disclosure and informed consumer choices. By raising awareness and advocating for safer practices, the study aimed to mitigate potential health hazards associated with everyday cosmetic and personal care product use.
Hatta MNA, Mohamad Hanif EA, Chin S-F, Neoh H-m. Pathogens and Carcinogenesis: A Review. Biology. 2021; 10(6):533. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10060533
Parsa N. Environmental factors inducing human cancers. Iran J Public Health. 2012;41(11):1-9.